Diary of a Trainee Teacher






         Teaching is tough job, and I’m only just beginning.

22 July, 2008

Oxbridge and widening participation

Filed under: Random — missbhave @ 8:10 am

I went to an Oxbridge college myself for one year until I failed the exams and was booted out. Although I think there were things the college could have done to help me succeed, on the whole I know it was entirely my own fault that I didn’t manage to make it through. The university experience is what you make of it, I knew what I was signing up for when I applied (independent learning, limited contact time, no books written after 1900 but excellent academics and high expectations) and my failure was ultimately my fault. I never expected a university with that much history to change its time honoured and much loved traditions and teaching methods to suit my learning style.

I do think Oxbridge is too highly populated with privately schooled students and that there should be more of a balance, but I do not think that it is the responsibility of Oxbridge (beyond not discriminating in favour of privately educated teenagers) to increase its intake of comprehensive school pupils. I think it is the responsibility of schools, teachers and parents to show its top students that Oxbridge is not an unrealistic expectation for them. Oxbridge can’t undo eighteen years of socialisation and convince students that they are suddenly Oxbridge material, when for so long everyone has told them they aren’t. Of course private school pupils are better equipped for Oxbridge, they have always had small classes, been surrounded by other motivated pupils and have always been expected to achieve highly. We shouldn’t be asking Oxbridge to change to accommodate our state school pupils, we should be changing out state schooling so that our children have a better chance at top quality institutions. They certainly can’t change their admissions policy to favour state school kids, how insulting would that be?

This is something that really annoys me. I went to a comprehensive school and sixth form college, and very few of us applied to Oxbridge, and even fewer got in. I made it in because I adapted myself to their interview techniques and made a good impression. By doing this I gave them the idea that I would be suitable for their teaching style and therefore deserved my place. The interview is integral to their admissions procedure because they need to know that applicants will be able to handle the things about Oxbridge that make them the elite, meaning the one on one tutorials, the independant working and the high level of expectations.

A degree in an Oxbridge college is a unique experience, characterised by centuries of tradition and history. If Oxbridge takes the approach suggested by Blunkett and is brought ‘into the 21st century’ then it ceases to be Oxbridge at all, and what’s the point of going?

7 July, 2008

Househunting :(

Filed under: Educational Issues — missbhave @ 8:28 am

I spent the weekend in the North (which seemed especially grim due to the torrential rain). I was wet and miserable and tramping around scruffy rental properties (with much too high price tags on them) in a rough area of Leeds. Not pleased. It turns out all the viewings we’ve lined up were in the same area and we hated the area. We found an area we do like, but it’s a bit late now. We’ll have to take another trip. Fortunately the area we like is where my French course is, so perhaps I can combine the french course with some quality house hunting. Mister Meanor can always trust my judgement. We just don’t have the time to take another jaunt to Leeds before the course starts. 

This moving house stuff is very stressful, I’m not looking forward to buying one, if getting a rental is this frustrating.

3 July, 2008

Schools and Sex

Filed under: Educational Issues — missbhave @ 1:43 am

The state of sex education in our secondary schools has always been a controversial topic, but with the introduction of sexual health clinics attached to some schools in Britain the issue has become even more hotly disputed.

Kids in Britain today receive seriously mixed messages.

Girls: dress in sexy clothes, wear makeup and talk and think about boys all the time, because your self worth is wrapped up how you look. Sex is no big deal on the telly, and it is how you tell boys you love them.

Boys: being heterosexual is all important (being ‘Gay’ is a slur on your masculinity) so you need to prove your manliness by asserting your heterosexuality at all points.

Girls: it is your responsibility to protect your modesty, if you wear the sexy clothes you see in magazines then you are ‘asking for it’ and boys will think you’re easy. If you do have sex then it’s all your fault, because you failed to protect your chastity and deliberately ‘drew him in’ with your sexy clothes.

Boys: if they dress sexy they want sex, even if they don’t know what it is. When girls say no they really mean yes. You can’t be expected to control your ‘manly’ urges.

Because sex is glamorised, girls dress for it and boys expect it. In order to keep the boyfriends that they need to be accepted among their peer group they will sleep with them, because they’ve been led to believe that this is the normal way to keep a boy interested. However, adults also believe that telling school children all about sex will deprive them of their innocence and make them into mini adults.

The truth as I see it is this, from puberty your body is ready to reproduce. It’s no good telling the menstruating girl’s body or the boy who’s getting frequent hard ons that they’re not ready for sex, because their bodies are telling them something different. Physically they are ready, but mentally they often are not. This is the important distinction. We spend too much time telling them that sex is for grown ups, that it’s fun, but not for you. Of course they want to do it, just like they want to smoke, and drink, and stay out late, and watch scary films, and eat too much junk food. What we need to tell them is the truth, that sex happens, that it has consequences and that it can be a very positive experience or a negative one, depending on the situation. We need to teach them that they should always be responsible for their own actions, boys and girls alike, that no means no and that choosing not to have sex is a valid choice and that choosing to have sex should be an active decision. We need to show them how to avoid being pregnant, how to avoid STDs, but also how to avoid being infertile in the future, what to do if someone pressures you into sex and how to handle adult relationships. Respect, self respect and respect for others and their bodies is what’s important.

In short we should be looking towards Europe, Germany and Holland, where an open and honest attitude to sexuality have led to their young people having sex later and whose teenage pregnancy rates are very low, rather than America, whose emphasis on abstinence only teaching has led to a shockingly high level of underage sex and teenage pregnancy.  

I understand that this will necessitate an almost complete change of attitute, but I think it’s a step we have to take if we really want to safeguard our children’s best interests.

Hosted by Edublogs.